Parametric Life Cycle Assessment for Buildings

Diagram

About this course...

With the built sector’s responsibility for nearly 40% of global carbon emissions, there is pressure and urgency to drastically reduce both the embodied and operational carbon in the buildings that we design as architects and engineers. The study of Life Cycle Assessment has allowed us to understand the whole-life environmental impacts of the materials that we select. However, with myriad design considerations (from climate zone, to building typology, to client requirements) and intricacies (which concrete mix to choose, how to space your structural bays, which glazing system to choose, which refrigerant to choose) comparative benchmarking studies have continually fallen short in explaining the decisions that lead to lower overall whole-life carbon scores.

During this course, we will approach Life Cycle Assessment from an object-oriented, computational perspective by utilizing BHoM Life Cycle Assessment Toolkit. BHoM (Buildings and Habitats open Model) is an open-source platform that is rooted in an object-oriented approach, serving as a common language between software platforms allowing seamless interoperability between building modelling and analysis. We will access this functionality by assessing Revit and Rhino models via both Grasshopper (visual programming) and Excel.

This object-oriented approach allows the physical assessment of building elements (mass, area, volume), a similar break down of the environmental attributes of the element’s material via an Environmental Product Declaration object, as well as the evaluation of Life Cycle Assessment metrics like Global Warming Potential (embodied carbon.)

When our building elements are evaluated through this lens, we are then able to produce pointed delta evaluations by element or scope (structures, foundations, enclosures, interiors or MEP) over a period of time via the BHoM Diffing Engine. This approach when applied to benchmarking allows meaningful comparison of projects by scope (if a project does not include MEP, exclude that scope from comparison in overall kgCO2e/m2 values.)

The approach of Life Cycle Assessment, when paired with structured objects and data can lead to many valuable insights for the building industry. Particularly when applied to problems like identifying forced labor in our building material supply chains or identifying the most harmful materials in our buildings when it comes to the health of the building occupants.

 

 

Course Objectives

  • Understand the tenets of the study of life cycle assessment: cradle to gate and cradle to grave, environmental metrics, environmental product declarations
  • Understand the merits of a data-based, object-oriented approach to the objects that we design
  • Study the environmental metrics associated with building elements (walls, floors, light fixtures)
  • Achieve meaningful temporal comparison of architectural, structural and MEP elements within a building
  • Utilize the Life Cycle Assessment methodology in other important areas: Healthy Materials and Embodied Suffering

 

>Topics and Tools

 

Section Description Software Requirements
Lecture Course Overview; Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Introduction to BHoM
Assignment Object Creation and Interoperability
Lecture Environmental Product Declarations + LCA A1-A3 Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Introduction to BHoM Datasets + EPD Objects
Assignment Creating and Sourcing EPD Datasets
Lecture LCA Scopes + Evaluations (Structures, Foundations, Enclosures) Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab BHoM LCA Evaluate Methods + SEI Scopes
Assignment Group Project 1 – Evaluations of Sample Project SEI
Lecture  LCA Scopes + Evaluations (MEP + Interiors) Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab BHoM LCA Evaluate Methods + MEP/TI Scopes
Assignment Group Project 1 – Evaluations of Sample Project MEP/TI
Lecture Design Decision Impacts on Embodied Carbon Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab BHoM Diffing Engine
Assignment Group Project 1 – Visualizations of Results/Changes
Lecture Guest Lecture: Benchmarking LCA Results + Policy (Aurora Jensen)  
Lab Present Group Project 1
Assignment Identify the industry context around LCA results: policy, tools
Lecture Existing Benchmarking Strategies Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Amalgamate Class Results, Create Benchmark Study
Assignment Interpret the results of the class benchmarking study 
Lecture Operational vs Embodied Carbon CARE Tool
Lab CARE Tool
Assignment Design decisions that could have an adverse effect on operational/embodied carbon
Lecture Guest Lecture: Healthy Materials Introduction (Kathleen Hetrick) Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Prepping Models for Healthy Materials Evaluations
Assignment Hypothesis on the validity of applying LCA methodologies in other contexts
Lecture Healthy Materials Industry Datasets Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Extend BHoM LCA Toolkit Methodology to Healthy Materials: Datasets, Evaluate Methods
Assignment  Group Project 2: Evaluate Assigned Building Objects for Healthy Materials
Lecture    
Lab Healthy Materials Group Project Results
Assignment  
Lecture Embodied Suffering (Identifying Forced Labor in Building Material Supply Chains) Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Prepping Models/Materials for Embodied Suffering Evaluations
Assignment Identify recent examples of embodied suffering in the AEC industry
Lecture Embodied Suffering (Identifying Forced Labor in Building Material Supply Chains) Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Excel
Lab Extend BHoM LCA Toolkit Methodology to Embodied Suffering
Assignment Group Project 3: Evaluate Assigned Building Objects for Embodied Suffering
Lecture    
Lab Embodied Suffering Group Project Results
Assignment  
Lecture Prioritizing the Focus in AEC: Embodied Carbon, Embodied Suffering, Healthy Materials  
Lab  
Assignment  

 

 

 

Course Offered: Arch 732